The Center for Children's Justice - Pennsylvania Chapter
Use the index above and the back button on your browser to easily navigate this website.
|
|
PRESS RELEASE February 15, 2002 - Colorado House of Representatives Health, Environment, Welfare and Institutions Committee hearing on House Bill 1275 - Concerning Dependent and Neglected Children. In a blatant application of viewpoint discrimination, HEWI committee chairwoman, Laurie Clapp, adjourned the hearing HB1275 after hearing testimony from all attendees who were opposed to the bill (numbering >approx. 5) and then pulled the bill without hearing testimony from those favoring the bill. Over 80 people had appeared to testify in favor of the bill, some traveling from as far away as Texas. The pretext for the viewpoint discrimination was an allegation that Suzanne Shell had disrupted the meeting. Shell attended the meeting for the purposes of video taping the proceedings for possible inclusion in her documentary film project. She possess a valid press pass issued by >the Rocky Mountain Media Collective. State and local governments may not limit or deny the public or the media access to public forums. Ms. Shell had set up her camera against a wall, well out of the way of any traffic, and had video taped the first hour of the session unobtrusively and with complete decorum, and without comment from the committee. As soon as the first witness attempted to testify in favor of the bill, without justifiable reason or provocation, Chairwoman Clapp sent the Sergeant at Arms to demand that Shell move her camera to the back of the room. Because Ms. Shell's video camera is not equipped with remote microphones, if she was moved to the back of the room, she would only be able to photograph the backs of people's heads and would not able to record any audio. She was essentially being told to turn off her camera. Ms. Shell refused to move, citing first amendment freedom of the press rights. The Sergeant at Arms then laid hands on Ms. Shell and assaulted her. When Ms. Shell attempted to video record his face, he blocked the camera lens with his hand. He refused to allow her to video record his identification. The Sergeant at Arms then left to get the State Patrol. Chairwoman Clapp gave Ms. Shell permission to continue video recording but instructed her to leave room for people to pass from behind the committee platform to the witness table. Ms. Shell readily agreed. The Sergeant at Arms returned with two troopers and again assaulted Ms. Shell, demanding that she leave. Shell insisted that she had permission from the chair to remain. The audience began to shout out "Leave her alone," and "Let her stay." A recess was called and Chairwoman Clapp confirmed that Shell was allowed to remain. When the hearing resumed, Ms. Shell was subjected to repeated harassment by the Vice Chair, Betty Boyd and other staff members. Shell continued to quietly video record in spite of the harassment and unprovoked disruptions until Chairman Clapp abruptly called a recess in the middle of the second witness's testimony in favor of the bill. Ms. Shell's press pass was confiscated by one of the representatives on the committee. The committee then held a secret meeting in an adjoining room, apparently without their attorney present, and without announcing it to public. A secret decision was subsequently made to postpone, and then changed to pulling, the bill. There is no record of the discussions leading up to those decisions or what the corresponding committee member votes were. Witnesses have reported that certain members of the committee approached them privately immediately after the hearing was adjourned and offered to hear their testimony secretly at a later date, possibly via telephone. One mother reported that the State Patrol had suggested she remove her children from the building because they were going to use force to remove Ms. Shell. The mother responded by saying, "I believe I want my children to watch you do that." Chairwoman Clapp announced to the public and on the record, which also goes over the internet, that Ms. Shell's press credentials were fraudulent and that the reason the bill was pulled was because Shell had been 'disruptive.' Ms. Shell has received many calls from the public who were present with offers to testify on her behalf; that she had done nothing to disrupt the meeting. Ms. Shell has confirmed with the Director of the Rocky Mountain Media Collective that nobody had attempted to verify the validity of her press pass with him. Despite the fact that Chairman Clapp had publicly declared her press pass to be fraudulent, Ms. Shell's press pass was eventually returned to her when she demanded it. Ms. Shell was subsequently informed that she was banned from future hearings. It is unclear as to the nature or extent of that ban. Since 1931, the U.S. Supreme Court has stated repeatedly that government attempts to censor the media are presumed unconstitutional. This ban also constitutes a prior restraint on Ms. Shell's ability to publish subsequent General Assembly proceedings. The Court has said that "any prior restraint on expression comes to this Court with a 'heavy presumption' against its constitutional validity." Ms. Shell has been subjected to a systematic pattern of intimidation and harassment where ever she goes for two years. While sitting silently in courtroom galleries, judges will address her, interrogate her and issue orders to her. When attending public meetings and press conferences, they will assign security personnel to follow her around. Ms. Shell is the publisher and owner of Sage Wisdom Press (book publishing), the publisher of an internet website http://www.profane-justice.org , a freelance journalist and editorial columnist, and a documentary film producer for Diogene's Quest Productions. She covers issues of public interest relating to child protection. Ms. Shell will be seeing appropriate legal remedies. Other persons attending the meeting have also stated their intentions to seek legal remedies. Contact Information: Suzanne Shell Director, American Family Advocacy Center |
Any questions? Any complaints?
You must type this address into your e-mail software. The link has been removed due to overwhelming spam. This web site is strictly for your information about what is happening in our state; Pennsylvania. Information and opinions on this website are NOT "legal" advice but ARE friendly advice from people who have been through the local domestic relations office and are very familiar with the crimes against humanity that office is getting away with strictly for PROFIT at the expense of fathers and their children. Feel free to copy and repost any information on this site unless said information is credited to a web site other than Pennsylvania Family Court Reform (this website). In this case, you must ask permission from the author, and since it's been our experience that most of the people that support our cause are good people, they most likely won't have a problem with it. It's time to reclaim our state and our rights as Americans that are being trampled and ignored by a select portion of our state government, who's sole interest is PROFIT from federal grants for "child support" collection, at our expense... our JUDICIAL branch.
|