The Center for Children's Justice - Pennsylvania Chapter
Use the index above and the back button on your browser to easily navigate this website.
|
|
Dear New York Times: Your article "Finding Common Ground on Poor Deadbeat Dads," (Ideas and Trends, Feb. 3) presupposes that the commonly used monetary guidelines for child support are correct and fair. They are neither. More than 30 states follow the guidelines of Policy Studies Institute of Colorado, which in Virginia were found indefensible at least to the extent that they misrepresent child care expenses, and which continue in use "because there is nothing better" (quote by panel member). PSI also happens to be in the business of child support collection, which is a conflict of interest. High guidelines mean more deadbeats to collect from. Your article questions none of this, even as it acknowledges the "bureaucratic hunger for a large slice of the child support pie." It is wrong to cite injustice only against the poor. The injustice of taking money unfairly exists equally for fathers who manage to keep their heads above water but who fail to garner sympathy as being destitute. They too are having their pockets picked by a system whose "logic overtook the policy." A large part of the child support rubric in America is simply larceny by false pretense, which is a crime against any person, regardless of their means. Mark |
Any questions? Any complaints?
You must type this address into your e-mail software. The link has been removed due to overwhelming spam. This web site is strictly for your information about what is happening in our state; Pennsylvania. Information and opinions on this website are NOT "legal" advice but ARE friendly advice from people who have been through the local domestic relations office and are very familiar with the crimes against humanity that office is getting away with strictly for PROFIT at the expense of fathers and their children. Feel free to copy and repost any information on this site unless said information is credited to a web site other than Pennsylvania Family Court Reform (this website). In this case, you must ask permission from the author, and since it's been our experience that most of the people that support our cause are good people, they most likely won't have a problem with it. It's time to reclaim our state and our rights as Americans that are being trampled and ignored by a select portion of our state government, who's sole interest is PROFIT from federal grants for "child support" collection, at our expense... our JUDICIAL branch.
|