The Center for Children's Justice - Pennsylvania Chapter
Use the index above and the back button on your browser to easily navigate this website.
|
|
I see I am not the only one going through this discrimination by child support laws. Domestic relations makes sure they take excessive amounts of money so the fathers cannot afford to fight for custody or even fight domestic relation mistakes in income. I to have applied for assistance to get a fair trail, but my gross pay is to high, if they go by net I would also qualify. Domestic relations hearing officer who would not except evidence of lower income because of a work related injury ,comp pay stub, and a doctors note. He claims my injury is faked to get out of paying support, so overestimated my income to almost $600.00 a month more than I receive. He also states that I can get a part time job to make this income up, although if I would do this I would probably loose workers comp. benefits, and also my medical doctor says I cannot work until I have this injury fixed. I believe my doctor has allot more experience in the medical field than the hearing officer, who I believe simply discriminated against me because I am a father. Children and youth has custody of our son. My ex in a hearing was given a break in her net income for child support her over time was not figured in, whereas my break, oh I don't one. In the appeal hearing my ex brought one pay stub to the hearing with no overtime on it and testified although for a year and half before she worked and now stopped before this hearing. The hearing officer took this testimony as creditable why was hers but not mine? She also collected support for children she did not have for 2 years which she admits. I tried numerous times to have this dropped domestic relations told me they don't and don't want to hear about it. I don't collect any support for a child I don't have, and I don't know any fathers who do either. MY EX COLLECTED CHILD SUPPORT FOR 2 YEARS FOR A CHILD SHE DID NOT EVEN HAVE. TRY TO GET THAT MONEY BACK, OR BETTER YET TRY TO HAVE DOMESTIC RELATIONS STOP TAKING THE MONEY OUT OF YOUR PAY CHECK. EVERY TIME I TRIED TO HAVE IT STOPPED MY EX WOULD TELL DOMESTIC RELATIONS SHE WILL TRY TO HAVE HIM NOW, SO DOMESTICS STILL GIVES HER SUPPORT. DO YOU KNOW ANY FATHERS WHO COLLECT SUPPORT FOR CHILDREN THEY DON'T HAVE? DOMESTICS TELLS ME WHEN I CALL APPEAL THE HEARING, OR DON'T TAKE YOUR KIDS. I GUESS I COULD APPEAL THE HEARING IF I WAS COLLECTING SUPPORT, I DON'T KNOW A ATTORNEY WHO WILL DO THIS FREE, AND SINCE I LOVE MY KIDS I GUESS NOT TAKING THEM IS OUT OF THE QUESTION. I JUST HAD A HEARING IN THE MASTER OFFICE AT SCHUYLKILL COUNTY COURT HOUSE AND WHEN I BROUGHT THIS UP TO THE HEARING OFFICER HE TOLD ME I DON'T CARE I DON'T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT IT. I GUESS HE STILL RECEIVES A FULL PAY CHECK TAX DOLLARS AT WORK. I WONDER WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF I WOULD DO THIS, I WONDER IF THEN HE WOULD CARE. I BET HE WOULD! MIKE |
Any questions? Any complaints?
You must type this address into your e-mail software. The link has been removed due to overwhelming spam. This web site is strictly for your information about what is happening in our state; Pennsylvania. Information and opinions on this website are NOT "legal" advice but ARE friendly advice from people who have been through the local domestic relations office and are very familiar with the crimes against humanity that office is getting away with strictly for PROFIT at the expense of fathers and their children. Feel free to copy and repost any information on this site unless said information is credited to a web site other than Pennsylvania Family Court Reform (this website). In this case, you must ask permission from the author, and since it's been our experience that most of the people that support our cause are good people, they most likely won't have a problem with it. It's time to reclaim our state and our rights as Americans that are being trampled and ignored by a select portion of our state government, who's sole interest is PROFIT from federal grants for "child support" collection, at our expense... our JUDICIAL branch.
|