The Center for Children's Justice - Pennsylvania Chapter

Use the index above and the back button on your browser to easily navigate this website.

On this page you will find the latest action that is being taken to correct a corrupt family court system in Pennsylvania. The items listed on this page will hopefully send a message that we aren't going to take the unfair treatment and the crimes that are being committed against us and our children by our judicial branch of government here in Pennsylvania. These petitions for impeachment are being watched closely so that they are not "swept under the rug".

UPDATE: Impeachment petitions are starting to pile up. As of now, there are 6 petitions submitted for 6 different judges and one for the "JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD". The House of Representatives is not taking any action and is still ignoring them ALL to this date. What's it going to take to get the powers that be to fulfill their constitutionally mandated responsibilities?

Petitions for Judicial Impeachment

If you are interested in filing an impeachment petition and would like to know what is involved, please CLICK HERE to learn more about how to file a petition in Pennsylvania and what acts warrant filing a petition to impeach a corrupt judge.

The code of judicial conduct

THE HONORABLE ALAN M. BLACK, JUDGE OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Abuse of power press release #1

	A father in a contentious child support proceeding filed a petition for impeachment A press release.
	The official impeachment petition (this can be used as a guideline for your own petition) In order to file your own petition for impeachment, submit SIGNED ORIGINAL Impeachment Petitions to the Clerk for the PA House of Reps. He must "file" and "record" receipt, and forward to the Judiciary Committee for action.
	Letters written to President Bush, Attorney General Ashcroft, Senators Shumer, Hatch, Spector, and Santorum. Subject: Nomination to Federal Bench for The Honorable James Knoll Gardner. Sample letters written by Gene Wrona. This is related to the Judge Alan Black impeachment case.
	Peaceful protest is not allowed in Pennsylvania. Since when can a sheriff simply take away rights guaranteed to citizens under the US Constitution? This gets better and better every day.
	Attorney Gene Wrona responds to the article that was published on May 17th in the Allentown Morning Call. In his response he points out the truth and how the published article misrepresents the truth. We, the watchful citizens like to call this "spin". It appears that the Morning Call is definitely not a "NO SPIN ZONE". Contact the Allentown Morning Call by e-mail to express your comments after you read this. The address is ardith.hilliard@mcall.com
	Petition to impeach the entire Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board for failure to investigate a complaint duly filed with the board; a total neglect of duty and a nonfeasance. In other words, they refuse to do their job and it appears that they are protecting those that are accused of blatant judicial misconduct. This will most likely be ignored just like every other petition that is filed against a corrupt state official. It seems that they protect their own. Read this and call your state rep and senator now.
	Letter to Senator Specter
	Judge Alan M. Black's response to the judicial conduct board.
	Lehigh County Attorney Eugene A. Wrona is the recipient of a formal complaint to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Disciplinary Board (imagine that) that was recently filed by Judge Alan M. Black. It is very clear to us why Judge Black filed this complaint against Attorney Wrona and it is going to require a separate page in order to post the facts. Click here (link temporarily disabled) to read all about it as Attorney Wrona answers the complaint that could result in him being disbarred if the Honorable Alan M. Black gets his way. All the facts are in. Readers can decide for yourselves and then contact the media (like the O'Reilly Factor) about this latest Pennsylvania judicial outrage. I kind of figured something like this would be coming. In Pennsylvania, attorneys are not permitted to stand up for what is right, only the prescribed agenda to remove children from their fathers along with the fathers money so that the state gets it's federal kickback for doing such a fine job.
	Letter to Attorney General Mike Fisher requesting criminal investigation of the court(s) in question.
	Response from Attorney General's Office. It appears that this office doesn't want to do it's job either and suggests that any complaints alleging misconduct against Pennsylvania Judges can be referred to the Judicial Conduct Board. Well, guess what, it WAS already referred there and was ignored, buried, swept under the rug. Just what avenues are left to get some corrective actions to this problem (that many of us face) out of our elected officials anyway? Looks like we are running out of options rather quickly.

THE HONORABLE HIRAM A. CARPENTER, JUDGE OF COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Impeachment petition

	Letter to the PA Judicial Conduct Board This is a letter to go with the impeachment petition that was filed in Blair county.
	On February 27 the Blair County petition was referred to the House Judiciary Committee. We will still be watching this and report any further action or lack there of.
	Letter to Representative Jerry Stern February 23, 2003
	House Judiciary Committee reply to inquiry on status of impeachment petition.
	Letter from Representative Thomas P. Gannon who is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. This letter assures the petitioner that "appropriate action will be taken".
	Letter to Representative Shuster
	Letter from Parliamentarin. I'm not even sure what the heck a "parliamentarin" is but that is what was sent to me. This is the latest status of various impeachment petitions. The status is IGNORED.
	Robert Kearns, the petitioner, sent an letter of inquiry to the House Judiciary Committee dated February 1, 2005 to find out why his petitions are being ignored. Click here.
	Here is Representative Leach's answer to petitions for judicial impeachment. Representative Daylin Leach says, in his response to Mr. Kearns, that that the Judiciary Committee doesn't "ACT" on petitions filed by private citizens. They only act of petitions filed by "members". What the HELL is this supposed to mean? Click here to read the entire response. You should be OUTRAGED after you read this. We now live under a KING and a HOUSE OF LORDS in Pennsylvania. The constitution has been shredded and no longer applies unless you are a "member". We are going to be following this very closely and all updates will be posted.

THE HONORABLE JOLENE KOPRIVA, BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

The petition for the impeachment of Judge Kopriva was filed sometime last summer by a man named Richard Reader. I am currently seeking further information on this one and will post updates as they are received. If anyone reading this knows Richard, please tell him to e-mail pfcr@childrensjustice.org so that I can get the details posted. Each and every one of these impeachment petitions that are filed sends a message to the legislature (our elected representation) that we are no longer going to tolerate our constitutional rights being violated by judicial corruption. We are no longer going to tolerate our kids being taken from us along with excessive amounts of money for no reason other than so that the state can PROFIT from it.

THE HONORABLE WILLIAM HENRY, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JEFFERSON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Impeachment Petition

THE HONORABLE MICHAEL T. CONAHAN, PRESIDENT JUDGE, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Affidavit for impeachment

Below is what the child involved in this case thinks.

	Michael Langdon Affidavit January 2004
	Michael Langdon Affidavit March 2005
	Michael Langdon Affidavit June 2005

THE HONORABLE WAYNE G. HUMMER JR., COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Impeachment petition in MS Word format as served.

	Exhibit A, document 1, document 2
	Exhibit B, document 1
	Exhibit C, document 1, document 2

Constitutional Challenge

A Notice to Court Administrator of Challenge to Constitutionality of Pennsylvania's Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 1910.16, as amended April 1, 1999, and Pennsylvania's Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 1910.19 was submitted to:

The Honorable Zygmont A. Pines
Acting Court Administrator of Pennsylvania
1515 Market Street, Suite 1414
Philadelphia, PA 19102

It was sent certified mail and so far, has been IGNORED. To view a copy of the constitutional challenge, click here. Letters of inquiry can be sent to the above address. Please do not hesitate to demand an explanation as to why a legitimate challenge is being ignored when all the proper procedures were followed to submit this challenge. These people work for YOU, the citizens of this commonwealth, and are accountable to YOU. If YOU pay taxes, YOU pay their salaries.

Act 81 of 1989 is the law that allows the legislature to shirk it's responsibility to create fair child support guidelines. This is the FIRST law that needs to be repealed as it violates the separation of powers doctrine. Click here to see who sponsored this legislation and vote accordingly.

Testimony

From Kevin Sheahen, Pres. of Pittsburgh, PA Chapter of NCFC BEFORE THE PA SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON RACIAL AND GENDER BIAS IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM

Cases Needed

	Dad currently in jail for contempt proceedings (child support)
	Dad did not have an attorney
	Dad was not offered an attorney at contempt hearing

If this is you or someone you know, please e-mail pfarus@attbi.com or call 724-643-9219

Legislation

House bill 888 is the latest joint custody legislation that has been introduced and is being blocked by the House Judiciary Committee (Representative O' Brien). To read the text of HB888, do a search HERE and then contact your state representative and tell them to move the bill on to the floor for a vote.

All old legislation that was previously listed under this topic has been moved to the legislation archive page. Senator Stewart Greenleaf must be removed from office. Representative O'Brien must be removed from office. These two individuals are PERSONALLY responsible for blocking any meaningful reform legislation.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Procedural Rules committee

There is also what is known as Pennsylvania Supreme Court Procedural Rules Committee. This committee's job is to make recommendations to the PA Supreme Court so that it can write domestic relations law in the form of procedural rules, which is a highly questionable practice since the judicial branch is only supposed to interpret the laws written by the legislature, not create laws. A recent conversation has been forwarded to me via e-mail that clearly demonstrates how individuals on this committee think. It is clear to me that they don't feel there is anything wrong with the way children are removed from one parent as common practice by domestic relations courts. From what I see, every excuse in the book is used to justify what domestic relations right on up the the PA Supreme Court does. The Pennsylvania child support extortion racket is blamed on "federal mandate", which we know is BS. Read it for yourself here. There is also an e-mail address included for contact purposes so that you can tell this committee what is really going on.

Pennsylvania's child support guidelines were up for review last year. Click Here for letters and e-mail that was sent to Ms. Patricia Miles, who is in charge of this committee by people who have reviewed the committee's recommendations. Letters and response are available for review as I get them posted. The people of Pennsylvania are directly pointing out what is wrong with the corrupt system and this committee refuses to acknowledge any of it. The say their recommendations are open for comment but when we tell them the truth about what is wrong with the corrupt child support system in Pennsylvania, they simply don't want to hear it. This is proof that it's all for state profit.

Click here for another letter to the PA Supreme Court Procedural Rules Committee. I am posting these for the enjoyment that I get knowing that they will probably be ignored by this committee. I have not seen a response to this one so I am keeping it separate from the others for now.

UPDATE: Recommendation 67 has been adopted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and is now "LAW". For more in formation go to http://www.courts.state.pa.us/ and look under "updates".

Check out the proposed legislation from 1975 I found while browsing the PA website. What happened between then and now?

Flyers and other information to be distributed

Most of these are in Microsoft Word format and can be printed out and hung EVERYWHERE.

PFCR Flyer

Any questions? Any complaints?
Do you want to tell your story?
Please feel free to send your comments via e-mail to

You must type this address into your e-mail software. The link has been removed due to overwhelming spam.

This web site is strictly for your information about what is happening in our state; Pennsylvania. Information and opinions on this website are NOT "legal" advice but ARE friendly advice from people who have been through the local domestic relations office and are very familiar with the crimes against humanity that office is getting away with strictly for PROFIT at the expense of fathers and their children. Feel free to copy and repost any information on this site unless said information is credited to a web site other than Pennsylvania Family Court Reform (this website). In this case, you must ask permission from the author, and since it's been our experience that most of the people that support our cause are good people, they most likely won't have a problem with it. It's time to reclaim our state and our rights as Americans that are being trampled and ignored by a select portion of our state government, who's sole interest is PROFIT from federal grants for "child support" collection, at our expense... our JUDICIAL branch.