Received this letter from Senator Gerlach RE: SB1276. It rasises the question
in my mind "Which members of the Judicial Subcommittee have the nerve to
stand up and tell us that they are the ones who are either illinformed or
ignorant of the facts or simply lawyers protecting the clan. It is hard to
figure what parent would endorse a bill which makes them an non parent the
instant that an umreliable spouse decides unilaterally to breech their marriage
contract. Can you figure what sane person would put a law like this in mothon
after what we have been through in this unaccountable court system. Under 1260,
nothing has changed as far as presumption of the right of a partne to remain a
parent when his spouse becomes unreliagle as a family protector. And nothing has
changed to force Judges and legal people to follow the orders of the victim who
is paying them and loosing his child. Nothing has changed as far as forcing the
judge who wants "disgressionary power without Accountability" to make
this demigod explain why his decision is really in the best interests of the
child. In fact, as we all know it may and usually is, not the best interests of
the child that prevail but rather the Best interests of the BAR's Judges and
Lawyers.
We need to know specifically who is undermining us. We need to know by name
so that we can address these people and find out if they are ill informed, on
the dole or simply stupid.or prejudice (With an agenda)
We can not afford to let the next generation suffer like we did while the
lawyers continue to make backroom quiet deals so that they can retain the right
to litigate our children out of our lives. They already have too much control
over our families.
Homer B. Davis, Jr., M.D.
Radnor, PA 19087
Dear Dr. Davis:
Thank you for your August 1 3th letter and CD. I appreciate you taking the
time to comment, in a most heartfelt way, your frustration and anxiety over our
current domestic relations system. I couldn't agree more that substantial
changes need to be made to this system and a good place to start is to provide,
in the law, that there be a presumption of joint legal and physical custody for
both parents of a child. That is why I introduced my legislation, but
unfortunately we do not have the support of a majority of the members of the
Senate Judiciary Committee to move it forward. Nonetheless, I will talk to
Senator Stewart Greenleaf once again to see if he would be willing to put this
legislation up for a vote (regardless of its outcome). By the way, Senator
Greenleaf also supports presumption of joint custody language and perhaps he
would be willing to bring this legislation forward before the Committee as we
return to session in the next few weeks.
Again, thank you or your letter.
Very truly yours,
Jim Gerlach JWG/cmm -
I will answer this question. Senator Stewart
Greenleaf is the one blocking each and every piece of legislation that attempts
to straighten out the criminally corrupt domestic relations system in this
state. Stewart Greenleaf is the head of the Senate JUDICIARY
Committee. It's time for Stewart Greenleaf to be UNSEATED. It's time
for Stewart Greenleaf to GO. I have been informed from SEVERAL different
sources that the entire problem is Stewart Greenleaf. He seems to like
things the way they are. He seems to assert HIS will and not that of those
he was elected to represent. Lets not forget that Stewart Greenleaf has
control of any legislation that has to do with fixing Domestic Relations.
Why do you think nothing EVER makes it out of the JUDICIARY COMMITTEE???
