The Center for Children's Justice - Pennsylvania Chapter


Use the index above and the back button on your browser to easily navigate this website.

 

Dear Mr.. Derbes,

My name is Brian Piaquadio,

I am writing to you with some questions about the Fatherhood Initiative in Pennsylvania. As I have read this is a pilot program to help initiate a more active role for fathers within their children's lives. As a NCP there are issues that I do not see this plan addressing. I have been dealing with the issue of trying to be a part of my child's life now for 12 yrs. The problems that face our society today and the effects of children who grow up without fathers are real and statistically confirmed. Unless we address all issues concerning children without fathers this program is seen as nothing but another tool to collect child support from NCP's. My questions have to do with what plans might be considered in the future concerning CP's who do not allow visitation and who repeatedly stand in defiance of court ordered visitation. Also in addressing the family court system in Pennsylvania who refuses to enforce these orders. Out of the millions of children without fathers actively in their lives, there is a large number like myself who are being denied this contact by the Custodial Parent.

Pennsylvania's viewpoint on child support and child custody/visitation is that they are two separate subjects. This is interesting considering that the statistics show that 90% of Fathers allowed to see their children on a regular basis pay their support. The "Best Interests of the Child" philosophy is applied only to the collection of support and not to the children's right to have access to both parents and to grandparents. There is a saying that it takes a village to raise a child. This also applies to extended family. Grandparents of NCP's are told that their time is a portion of the NCP's visitation time. This is fine as long as custodial parents are willing to allow such visitation.

My questions are as follows:

1. Is there any plan in the future to either take a look at or address the issue of child custody/visitation and the family courts gender bias when it comes to these issues ? (Over 80% of CP's are mothers)

2. Is there a plan for strengthening enforcement of visitation orders and to truly punish those mothers who do not encourage or make available their children to have loving relationships with the fathers? (If so will it be as active and thorough as the enforcement of Fathers who are not paying support?) A healthy Father-child relationship needs to be encouraged by Custodial Mothers for the "Best Interest of the child"

3. Is there any plan to form a network of county offices or contacts to help fathers who are seeking a more active role in their children's lives?

4. Is there any plan in place to encourage low-income fathers to seek out technical training or education to better provide for their children. An example would be what they are trying in Maryland: A low-income father who seeks education or technical training to increase his income can be forgiven for a portion of his arrears. Presently Pennsylvania punishes fathers who are seeking to higher their education by refusing to lower their support in order for them to go to school. This would be a win win situation for children fathers and families. Thru better education and training fathers can provide steady support and in increasing amounts. This program would be similar to the Veterans Administrations Vocational Rehabilitation Plan.

The lack of fathers in their children's lives is an epidemic in this country and around the world. This epidemic however must not put fathers solely to blame. Gender bias family court systems and custodial parents should be held equally accountable for the lack of involvement by today's fathers. Fathers today feel like they have been abandoned by a system that views them merely as a financial providers and not much else. A Fathers love, encouragement, moral support, mentoring, and active participation cannot be replaced with a dollar figure.

Mr. Derbes,

I have been remarried now for 10 yrs and have 4 children who live under my roof. The joys and rewards of having those children in my life are immeasurable. However, my heart is always empty for the child that I cannot see, not because I am a bad father or a court order. But because of a Custodial mother who does not value my involvement and a gender bias family court system that has left me without a relationship with my son. He is now 12 yrs old and I have only been able to see him twice in the last 10 yrs. I have and keep going back to court but have yet been able to get the family court system to honor those visitation orders, or frankly give a damn...

A Concerned Father

Brian Piaquadio

Any questions?  Any complaints?
Do you want to tell your story?
Please feel free to send your comments via e-mail to

You must type this address into your e-mail software.  The link has been removed due to overwhelming spam.

This web site is strictly for your information about what is happening in our state; Pennsylvania.  Information and opinions on this website are NOT "legal" advice but ARE friendly advice from people who have been through the local domestic relations office and are very familiar with the crimes against humanity that office is getting away with strictly for PROFIT at the expense of fathers and their children.  Feel free to copy and repost any information on this site unless said information is credited to a web site other than Pennsylvania Family Court Reform (this website).  In this case, you must ask permission from the author, and since it's been our experience that most of the people that support our cause are good people, they most likely won't have a problem with it.  It's time to reclaim our state and our rights as Americans that are being trampled and ignored by a select portion of our state government, who's sole interest is PROFIT from federal grants for "child support" collection, at our expense... our JUDICIAL branch.