The Center for Children's Justice - Pennsylvania Chapter


Use the index above and the back button on your browser to easily navigate this website.

 

Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:16:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Gary Bremer garyb7000@yahoo.com
Subject: Child support guidelines
To: patricia.miles@pacourts.us

Ms. Miles,

I am writing you regarding the current child support guidelines.  Currently child support guidelines are based upon studies which utilize intact households. However, studies based upon intact households are completely unjust and inappropriate for the following reasons:

- The federal government does not tell people in intact households how to spend their money.
- Intact households are practically non-existent in child support cases.

With the above taken into consideration, it would also stand to reason that the practice of utilizing studies based upon intact households would be unconstitutional for the  following reasons:

- If the government does not tell people in intact households how to spend their money, how can it use this same reasoning to determine how people in non-intact households to spend their money?

This was the very same reasoning which was utilized in the 1995 decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme court regarding college education expenses in child support cases: divorced parents could be required to pay for a child's college education while married ones could not. Utilizing this reasoning it would also stand that: divorced parents could be required to spend a specific amount on the care of their  children while married ones could not.

If intact households are practically non-existent in child support cases, why utilize this as a basis for child support guidelines?  Being that intact households are practically nonexistent in child support cases renders use of these studies completely unjustifiable due to the fact that non-intact households are classified the same as intact households, and as such use of this practice would be considered to be a direct violation of the fourteenth amendment of the US constitution which all US citizens are afforded.

As a result of these findings, the basis upon use of studies utilizing intact households should be abandoned in exchange for just and appropriate studies that take into consideration non-intact households.  Additionally, the use of studies that utilize intact households has been proven to be capable of producing child support awards that do not reflect the actual costs of raising a child. As a result, I am also attaching a link for the cost shares model, which more accurately depicts the costs of raising a child. Please consider use of this model in setting child support guidelines. Thank you for your time.

Sincerely

Gary Bremer

http://www.courts.mi.gov/scao/services/focb/formula/psi-ch4.pdf

Any questions?  Any complaints?
Do you want to tell your story?
Please feel free to send your comments via e-mail to

You must type this address into your e-mail software.  The link has been removed due to overwhelming spam.

This web site is strictly for your information about what is happening in our state; Pennsylvania.  Information and opinions on this website are NOT "legal" advice but ARE friendly advice from people who have been through the local domestic relations office and are very familiar with the crimes against humanity that office is getting away with strictly for PROFIT at the expense of fathers and their children.  Feel free to copy and repost any information on this site unless said information is credited to a web site other than Pennsylvania Family Court Reform (this website).  In this case, you must ask permission from the author, and since it's been our experience that most of the people that support our cause are good people, they most likely won't have a problem with it.  It's time to reclaim our state and our rights as Americans that are being trampled and ignored by a select portion of our state government, who's sole interest is PROFIT from federal grants for "child support" collection, at our expense... our JUDICIAL branch.